About our logo

CSN Central NY Chapter

Tuesday, April 22, 2008

A visit to Guaviare (1)


From: Adam Isacson <cipcolombia@gmail.com>
Reply-To: <cip-colombia-news-owner@googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 18:18:48 -0400
To: <cip-colombia-news@googlegroups.com>
Subject: A visit to Guaviare (1)

CIP Colombia Program
April 21, 2008
 
A visit to Guaviare (1) <http://www.cipcol.org/?p=587>

  

(This is the first of a few posts of my visit to Guaviare last week. All photos posted here may be reproduced without permission, with credit given.)

From April 14 to 16, I paid a brief visit to San José del Guaviare, a small city in Colombia's vast, empty southern plains. I was the guest of the town's new mayor, Pedro Arenas, a young, reformist politician from a social-movement background who has visited us in Washington several times over the past ten years.

I had not visited San José, the capital of Colombia's department (province) of Guaviare, since January 1998. That was my first of what is now nearly forty visits to Colombia. On that initial visit, I was part of a delegation of non-governmental organizations. Pedro Arenas, then the head of the Guaviare Youth Movement, a local social service and advocacy organization, organized our stay in Guaviare, arranging meetings with everyone from the governor, bishop and military authorities to the region's peasant and indigenous leaders.

I had not been back to Guaviare in the intervening ten years, in part because Pedro Arenas, our main contact there, spent much of this period in Bogotá as a member of Colombia's Congress. During those ten years, however, the United States was quite active in Guaviare.

In a vain effort to stem cultivation of coca, the plant used to make cocaine, U.S. spray planes blanketed about 500,000 acres of Guaviare with herbicides. U.S. funds paid for the training and equipping of new military units headquartered in the area, and supported a massive, years-long military offensive - known as "Plan Patriota" - in Guaviare and nearby departments. But the department was almost completely left out of the U.S. government's far smaller efforts to help Colombia govern its territory and lift residents out of poverty. U.S. economic aid to Guaviare over the past decade, in all forms, has totaled less than $1 million.

 <http://www.cipcol.org/images/guaviare/town/IMG_3580.jpg> After ten years, what has been the outcome of such an unbalanced approach? Is the department safer? Are its rural areas more secure? Are guerrillas and paramilitaries weaker? Has the drug trade been affected? Has the department's overwhelming poverty eased at all? Have repeatedly fumigated coca-growing families found other ways to feed themselves? Is the department's huge displaced population getting access to basic services and a dignified existence? Are the conflict's thousands of local victims learning the truth about what happened to them and their loved ones, recovering stolen property, or receiving reparations? After ten years, has U.S. policy helped this lawless, stateless, violent zone move at all toward good governance?

The answers to some of these questions, I found, was yes. To others, however, the answer was a clear, resounding "no." In general, the security situation was better, though gains were mainly concentrated in town centers. Coca cultivation was still widespread but reduced; most of those interviewed gave the credit to more frequent military operations on the ground, not fumigation from the air. Rural areas remain nearly as violent and ungoverned as they were ten years ago; though the once-absent military is now a frequent combatant, the rest of the state continues to be absent. The region's huge population of displaced people and other poor residents are getting a modest amount of attention in the larger towns, mainly from programs that offer cash handouts. Meanwhile, efforts to help victims of some of the country's worst violence are barely underway.

<http://www.cipcol.org/images/guaviare/town/IMG_3594.jpg>
Looking across the Guaviare River at Meta department.
Guaviare's recent history


The department of Guaviare is one of several that make up a vast California-sized region east and south of Colombia's Andes mountains. Flat and hot, this zone of dusty savannahs and dense jungles, ribboned by muddy rivers that empty into the Orinoco and Amazon rivers, is home to only about 4 percent of Colombia's population.

 <http://www.cipcol.org/images/guaviare/town/IMG_3451.jpg>

This is Colombia's coca-growing heartland, an area so far from government presence that some smaller riverside towns lack access to the central government's currency, relying instead on grams of crude coca paste as a unit of exchange. It has also been the historical rearguard of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), Colombia's oldest and largest (9,000-15,000 members) guerrilla group.

Like much of Colombia's southern plains, Guaviare was settled in the past few decades by cattlemen and coca growers, many of them displaced by violence elsewhere. As recently as the 1960s, this was wilderness, settled only by a few rugged frontiersmen and outlaws - as well as nomadic tribes of indigenous hunter-gatherers who had been there for perhaps thousands of years.

Within the past two generations, outsiders began to arrive in greater numbers, either pushed out by violence or drawn by the possibility of land for the taking - the property of any who wished to knock down jungle and carve out a life on the "agricultural frontier."

Colombia's government, however, failed to follow the colonizers to places like Guaviare. In a state of abandonment, with no security, no basic services, not even a road network, people soon learned to coexist with the armed insurgent groups that took refuge there, acting as a crude surrogate government.

Like many rainforest areas, Guaviare has poor soils. It is difficult to grow crops there sustainably, especially hard-to-transport products that yield low farm-gate prices. The coca plant, however, can be cultivated profitably; its leaves can easily be turned into a paste that is easily transported in the roadless region and sold to narcotraffickers willing to pay prices sufficient to guarantee a profit.

 <http://www.cipcol.org/images/guaviare/town/IMG_3579.jpg>
A painting of a coca-paste laboratory hangs on a restaurant wall in San José del Guaviare.

A coca-grower with 2 1/2 acres, the UN Office on Drugs and Crime estimated a few years ago, nets about US$199 per month, or just over US$6 per day. This is not enough to lift a family over the poverty line (over 80 percent of Guaviare's rural population lives in poverty), but it yields more than any other crop that can be harvested within a year of planting.

Guaviare's coca boom began in the 1980s and has never truly ended. Together with cattle-ranching, coca is the reason why Guaviare has the highest deforestation rate of all of Colombia's thirty-two departments.

Today, about 150,000 people live in Guaviare. This is still rather sparse for an area the size of Vermont and New Hampshire put together, but population growth continues to be rapid and uncontrolled.

 <http://www.cipcol.org/images/guaviare/town/IMG_3452.jpg>
The locals eat river fish like bagre for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

The department has four municipalities (counties), each of them enormous in size but small in population. The departmental capital, San José del Guaviare, is about the size of Connecticut, but with only about 60,000 people. Of these, 40,000 are concentrated in the rapidly expanding county seat. More than one-third of the town center's population, 14,000 people, are internally displaced people - refugees forced from the surrounding countryside and elsewhere by violence during the last ten to fifteen years.

A new mayor

The mayor San José del Guaviare is Pedro Arenas, a politician who comes from a social-movement background. In the 1990s, Arenas co-founded the Guaviare Youth Movement, whose community radio station has been one of the municipality's main information sources for the past ten years.

Arenas went on to serve for four years in Colombia's Congress. Then last October, at the age of 36, he was elected to the mayor's office with 60 percent of the vote, winning in rural areas and poor urban neighborhoods, as well as in the merchant neighborhoods of San José del Guaviare's town center.

 <http://www.cipcol.org/images/guaviare/town/IMG_3517.jpg>
Mayor Pedro Arenas (at right with beige hat).

I have known Pedro Arenas since 1997, when the Colombia Human Rights Network brought him to Washington and several other cities to discuss the rapidly worsening situation in Guaviare. At the time, Arenas's Guaviare Youth Movement had run afoul of the right-wing paramilitaries who were pouring into Guaviare for the first time, openly aided by the security forces.

A key battleground

In July 1997, just a few months before Pedro's visit, the military and police had stood aside as two planeloads of thugs from the paramilitary strongholds of northwestern Colombia arrived in San José del Guaviare's airport. In what would be the paramilitaries' first foray into southern Colombia, the gunmen went about 40 miles downriver to the port town of Mapiripán, across the river in Meta department. There, hit lists in hand, they spent an entire week torturing and killing more than fifty of the town's residents, dumping their bodies in the Guaviare river.

Of the paramilitary leaders who ordered the crime, the hitmen who carried it out, and the military leaders who - in the name of hitting a guerrilla stronghold - allowed it to happen, very few have ever been tried or convicted. Most still walk freely among their fellow Colombians.

Mapiripán would be the first of a gruesome chain of massacres over the next five or six years throughout Colombia's southern plains. As the paramilitaries sought to attack the guerrillas by "draining the sea to kill the fish" - killing and intimidating social leaders in guerrilla-controlled areas - thousands would die at their hands, their bodies either dumped in rivers or turning up today in Cambodia-style mass graves.

The military stood idly by, if not collaborated openly. Local leaders told of the daily roadblock that the United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia (AUC) maintained nearly every day during the late 1990s and early 2000s, about a half-mile down the only paved road from the local military battalion's headquarters. Those detained at this roadblock, they said, would not appear again.

 <http://www.cipcol.org/images/guaviare/town/IMG_3500.jpg>

Meanwhile - and in part as a result - the guerrillas, who as the only entity resembling a government in Guaviare had enjoyed popular support as late as the mid-1990s, grew ever more paranoid, brutal and greedy. Fear of paramilitary (and later military) informants led the FARC to start treating the population with far greater suspicion, murdering anyone suspected to have given information or other aid to the other side.

At the same time, the FARC came to depend ever more on the drug trade as a source of funding. Flush with new funds from coca and cocaine production, the FARC were recruiting and buying guns at an accelerating rate. While this made the guerrillas a very formidable fighting force, it also led them to treat their social base - the population of neglected zones like Guaviare - like an ATM. The imperative of controlling the coca boomtowns and strategic trafficking routes of areas like Guaviare led the guerrillas increasingly to mistreat and alienate the people with whom they had long coexisted.

Coca and fumigation

Whether spurred by the guerrillas or lured by the prospect of easy money, Guaviare's landholders - nearly all of them owners of small tracts - turned increasingly to the coca trade. By the mid-1990s, when Colombia became South America's largest coca-producing country for the first time, Guaviare was the department with the largest amount of coca cultivation.

As a result, the United States pressured the government of President César Gaviria to allow an aerial herbicide fumigation to begin in 1994. The program expanded quickly over the next few years.

For its first several years, all of Colombia's fumigation flights took off from the Counter-Narcotics Police base adjacent to the airport in San José del Guaviare. About 200,000 hectares (500,000 acres) of Guaviare have been sprayed with the "Round-Up Ultra" glyphosate-based spray mixture since the program's initiation, making it either the first or second most-sprayed department in the country.

The results have been mixed at best. Fourteen years of spraying in Guaviare have made clear that sustained, heavy herbicide spraying can indeed reduce coca cultivation in a specific area, for a specific period of time. Spraying during the second half of the 1990s reduced the amount of coca that the United States and the United Nations measured in Guaviare. That reduction, however, was canceled out by a sharp growth in coca-growing further to the south, out of the spray planes' range, in Putumayo department near the border with Ecuador.

A big component of the U.S. "Plan Colombia" aid package in 2000 sought to expand the Guaviare-based spray program into Putumayo. After 2000, once the spray fleet reduced its activity in Guaviare in order to fumigate in Putumayo and elsewhere, coca cultivation in Guaviare again shot upward.



It has taken three years of intense spraying, from 2003 to 2006, to reduce coca-growing in Guaviare by two-thirds, to just under 10,000 hectares. (2007 data won't be available until June.)

When I was in San José del Guaviare last week, the spray program was continuing to function at a very rapid tempo. The fumigation planes and police escort helicopters based in San José had just finished another round of intense spraying. They were not present during my visit, however: they had just moved to the city of Barrancabermeja in the north-central Magdalena Medio region, from where they would be spraying the coca fields of southern Bolívar department.

For at least a couple of months, Guaviare will not be sprayed. All whom I asked, police included, agreed that the department's coca growers would be very likely to replant during this "down" period in the spray program, causing coca cultivation to move upward again. The department has only seen a minimal amount of the aerial eradication that the government of Álvaro Uribe has been encouraging throughout the country.

 <http://www.cipcol.org/images/guaviare/town/IMG_3454.jpg>

Why, after being so heavily and repeatedly sprayed for fourteen years, would Guaviare's coca growers still insist on growing so much coca? Probably because so little has been done to bring the state into the department's rural areas, much less to encourage alternative income sources. Alternative-development investment - whether by the United States or any other foreign donors - is zero in Guaviare. The same, reports the UN, is the case in the massive neighboring departments of Meta, Caquetá, and Vichada, which together with Guaviare account for 40 percent of Colombia's coca cultivation.

Not a dollar has been invested in alternative development or governance projects in Guaviare. Here, the strategy has been the very definition of all stick and no carrot. It is no wonder, then, that the coca trade persists in Guaviare, fourteen years after the first spray mission flew over the department.

Coming next: the security situation

Monday, March 31, 2008

FW: LA Times Editorial: Chiquita's trade with terrorists

Sunday, March 30, 2008
Editorial: Chiquita's trade with terrorists
The Los Angeles Times

http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/opinion/la-ed-chiquita29mar29,1,417
7424.story
(Tags -> Colombia : U.S. Policy: Chiquita Case, U.S. Policy: : English)

The cast of villains in Latin American politics always seems to
feature the same players: left-wing guerrillas, right-wing death
squads and Chiquita Brands International. The leftist rebels want to
take from the rich and give to the poor, the right-wing death squads
want a political system that favors a wealthy elite, and Chiquita
wants bananas. And in pursuit of an endless supply of tropical gold,
it is even willing to placate Colombian terrorists.

Although the U.S. State Department placed the left-wing Revolutionary
Armed Forces of Colombia, known as FARC, on the list of terrorist
organizations in 1997, and added the right-wing United Self Defense
Forces in 2001, Chiquita did business with both, making "protection
payments" it said were necessary to safeguard the lives of its
employees. U.S. law prohibits such deals with terrorists, but when the
government caught Chiquita in violation, it graciously agreed to fine
the company $25 million -- the precise amount the company had
suggested. None of that money, however, will reach the victims of the
terrorists that Chiquita's money helped arm.

That's why a lawsuit filed this month by the widows of five men killed
by the FARC gives such grim satisfaction. It joins several others,
also in federal district court in Miami, accusing Chiquita of
complicity in the deaths of Colombians killed by the two paramilitary
groups. This most recent suit seeks unspecified damages, but we can
only hope the company is punished severely for a business strategy
that enabled terrorists in order to protect Chiquita's people and
profits.

While the FARC was dragging three American military contractors off to
the jungle -- where, five years later, they are still being held,
along with hundreds of other hostages -- Chiquita was doing business
with their captors. And while American taxpayers were sending Colombia
billions of dollars in military aid to fight drug trafficking -- the
primary source of funding for the terrorists -- Chiquita was
countering that effort by providing revenue to the thugs.

Maybe it's true that Chiquita couldn't have done business in rebel
territory without negotiating with the rebels, but that was its
choice. And if dealing with terrorists is a legitimate business
expense, then so is compensation for terrorists' victims. Having made
a deal with the devil, it's time for Faust to pay up.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CIP Colombia News" group.
To post to this group, send email to cip-colombia-news@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cip-colombia-news-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cip-colombia-news?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


------ End of Forwarded Message

FW: Washington Post: Colombian Troops Kill Farmers, Pass Off Bodies as Rebels'

To: <cip-colombia-news@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Washington Post: Colombian Troops Kill Farmers, Pass Off Bodies as
Rebels'


Sunday, March 30, 2008
Colombian Troops Kill Farmers, Pass Off Bodies as Rebels'
Juan Forero
The Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/29/AR2008032901
118.html?hpid=sec-world
(Tags -> Colombia : U.S. Policy: Human Rights Cases, U.S. Policy: : English)

SAN FRANCISCO, Colombia -- All Cruz Elena González saw when the
soldiers came past her house was a corpse, wrapped in a tarp and
strapped to a mule. A guerrilla killed in combat, soldiers muttered,
as they trudged past her meek home in this town in northwestern
Colombia.

She soon learned that the body belonged to her 16-year-old son,
Robeiro Valencia, and that soldiers had classified him as a guerrilla
killed in combat, a claim later discredited by the local government
human rights ombudsman. "Imagine what I felt when my other son told me
it was Robeiro," González said in recounting the August killing. "He
was my boy."

Funded in part by the Bush administration, a six-year military
offensive has helped the government here wrest back territory once
controlled by guerrillas and kill hundreds of rebels in recent months,
including two top commanders of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of
Colombia, or FARC.

But under intense pressure from Colombian military commanders to
register combat kills, the army has in recent years also increasingly
been killing poor farmers and passing them off as rebels slain in
combat, government officials and human rights groups say. The tactic
has touched off a fierce debate in the Defense Ministry between
tradition-bound generals who favor an aggressive campaign that centers
on body counts and reformers who say the army needs to develop other
yardsticks to measure battlefield success.

The killings, carried out by combat units under the orders of regional
commanders, have always been a problem in the shadowy, 44-year-old
conflict here -- one that pits the army against a peasant-based rebel
movement.

But with the recent demobilization of thousands of paramilitary
fighters, many of whom operated death squads to wipe out rebels, army
killings of civilians have grown markedly since 2004, according to
rights groups, U.N. investigators and the government's internal
affairs agency. The spike has come during a military buildup that has
seen the armed forces nearly double to 270,000 members in the last six
years, becoming the second-largest military in Latin America.

There are varying accounts on the number of registered extrajudicial
killings, as the civilian deaths are called. But a report by a
coalition of 187 human rights groups said there are allegations that
between mid-2002 and mid-2007, 955 civilians were killed and
classified as guerrillas fallen in combat -- a 65 percent increase
over the previous five years, when 577 civilians were reported killed
by troops.

"We used to see this as isolated, as a military patrol that lost
control," said Bayron Gongora of the Judicial Freedom Corp., a
Medellin lawyers group representing the families of 110 people killed
in murky circumstances. "But what we're now seeing is systematic."

The victims are the marginalized in Colombia's highly stratified
society. Most, like Robeiro Valencia, are subsistence farmers. Others
are poor Colombians kidnapped off the streets of bustling Medellin,
the capital of this state, Antioquia, which has registered the most
killings.

Amparo Bermudez Dávila said her son, Diego Castañeda, 27, disappeared
from Medellin in January 2006. Two months later, authorities called to
say he had been killed, another battlefield death. They showed her a
photograph of his body, dressed in camouflage.

"I said, 'Guerrilla?' " she recalled. "My son was not a guerrilla. And
they told me if I didn't think he was a guerrilla, then I should file
a complaint."

Military prosecutors ordinarily initiate investigations when the army
kills someone. In cases that appear criminal, civilian prosecutors
take over, as they did in the slayings of Valencia and Castañeda in
San Francisco. But human rights groups and government prosecutors say
the initial probes have usually been perfunctory, and investigators
have been under intense pressure from high-ranking military officers
to rule in the army's favor.

Such challenges have made tabulating the exact number of dead
civilians impossible, though officials at the attorney general's
office and the inspector general's office revealed recent estimates in
interviews.

The attorney general's office is investigating 525 killings of
civilians, all but a handful of which occurred since 2002 and in which
706 soldiers and officers are implicated. The office has another 500
cases, involving hundreds more victims, yet to be opened. The
inspector general's office, meanwhile, is investigating 650 cases from
2003 to mid-2007 that could involve as many as 1,000 victims, said
Carlos Arturo Gomez, the vice inspector general.

"Last year, the number of complaints shot up," Gomez said. "Some have
said the cause could be unscrupulous military members who want to show
results from false operations. Others say it's the product of pressure
from the high command, the push for results."

The trend has prompted concern among some members of the U.S.
Congress. Sen. Patrick J. Leahy (D-Vt.), chairman of the Senate
Appropriations foreign operations subcommittee, said he is holding up
$23 million in military aid until he sees progress in the fight
against impunity and state-sponsored violence.

"We've had six years, $5 billion in U.S. aid. More than half of it has
gone to the Colombian military, and we find the army is killing more
civilians, not less," Leahy said in an interview. "And by all
accounts, all independent accounts, we find that civilians are just
being taken out, executed and then dressed up in uniforms so they can
claim body counts of guerrillas killed."

President Álvaro Uribe's government, which has had a string of recent
successes against the FARC, has defended itself against the
accusations and contends they are part of an international campaign
designed to discredit the armed forces. Indeed, some officials say the
FARC is prodding the families of rebels killed in combat to claim the
dead were civilians.

Still, Defense Minister Juan Manuel Santos acknowledges civilian
deaths and has initiated steps that include new rules of engagement,
assigning inspectors to combat units to advise commanders on the use
of force and improving human rights training for soldiers.

The military has also been streamlining its justice system and
transferring more cases to the attorney general's office, which the
United Nations says must have a greater role if extrajudicial
executions are to be eradicated. The attorney general's office said
more than 200 members of the military have been detained as
prosecutors investigate their involvement in the killings of
civilians, with 13 convicted last year.

"I have said this very clearly: The soldier who commits a crime
becomes a criminal, and he will be treated as a criminal," Santos
said.

Santos also has stressed, in speeches and directives, that the army's
anti-guerrilla policy should be more focused on generating desertions
than accumulating combat kills, the traditional method of measuring
success. "I've told all my soldiers and policemen that I prefer a
demobilized guerrilla, or a captured guerrilla, to a dead guerrilla,"
Santos said.

But the Defense Ministry's reformers have been met by influential
generals who have defended officers accused of slayings and favor a
more traditional strategy for defeating the rebels.

That approach means giving field commanders autonomy and instilling a
philosophy that stresses swift engagement with the rebels.

"What's the result of offensives? Combat," Gen. Mario Montoya, head of
Colombia's army, said in an interview. "And if there's combat, there
are dead in combat."

Human rights groups see a disturbing trend, saying the tactics used by
some army units are similar to those that death squads used to
terrorize civilians. A top U.N. investigator said some army units went
as far as to carry "kits," which included grenades and pistols that
could be planted next to bodies.

"The method of killing people perceived as guerrilla collaborators is
still seen as legitimate by too many members of the army," said Lisa
Haugaard, director of Latin America Working Group, a Washington-based
coalition of humanitarian groups.

After she interviewed a number of families of victims, she determined
that in many of the cases soldiers "appeared to be going on missions,
not accidentally detaining and killing people," she said.

The highest-ranking officer implicated in extrajudicial killings is
Col. Hernan Mejía.

A former army sergeant who was under Mejía's command, Edwin Guzman,
recounted in an interview how Mejía's unit would kill peasant
farmers, dress them in combat fatigues and call in local newspaper
reporters to write about the supposed combat that had taken place.

Guzman, now a government witness against Mejía, said soldiers
participated because they knew the army gave incentives -- from extra
pay to days off -- for amassing kills in combat. "This is because the
army gives prizes for kills, not for control of territory," he said.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"CIP Colombia News" group.
To post to this group, send email to cip-colombia-news@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
cip-colombia-news-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cip-colombia-news?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---


------ End of Forwarded Message

 

 

© 2005 CSN
News | Action | Links | About CSN | Donate | Join | Chapters | Delegations | Contact CSN | Contact Webmaster